Resources

Qualitative Research Resources

Developing resources to support qualitative and mixed methods researchers on the Melbourne Children’s Campus is ongoing. Please check here regularly for updates.  

Currently we do not have one standard protocol template for qualitative research as there are several different methodologies each requiring different details. In place of this we have guidelines that cover key areas relevant to qualitative research that are updated regularly as changes in regulations and privacy legislation occur.   

The Qualitative Research Guidelines can be found here: https://metis.melbournechildrens.com/MCTC193 

·         Running virtual focus groups and interviews  

·         Dictaphones 

·         Web conferencing transcription 

·         External human transcription 

·         ChatGPT and Research   

·         Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, Jonathan Craig, Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Volume 19, Issue 6, December 2007, Pages 349–357,  doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 

·         O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388. PMID: 24979285. 

·         Huria, T., Palmer, S.C., Pitama, S. et al. Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement. BMC Med Res Methodol 19, 173 (2019). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8 

·         Critical Appraisal Checklists 

·         Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2020;1(1):31-42. doi:10.1177/2632084320947559 

Past QRCoP meetings are a valuable source of information from researchers who have experience in different methodologies, methods and analysis techniques.  

Past QRCoP Recordings

These additional online video resources have been recommended from within the QRCoP. 

YouTube videos – Coding

·         Why Do We Code?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science) 

·         What is a Code?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science) 

·         What Does Coding Looks Like?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science) 

·         The Cycles of Coding: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science) 

·         How to Know You Are Coding Correctly: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science) 

 

International Institute for Qualitative Methodology webinars

·        Ten Top Tips in Qualitative Data Analysis for New Researchers (Jude Spiers)  

·    Introduction to Interpretive Descriptive methodology (Sally Thorne)

·    Archived webinars: https://www.ualberta.ca/international-institute-for-qualitative-methodology/webinars/master-class-webinar/archived-webinars.html  

General texts about qualitative research

2020. Liamputtong. Qualitative Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.  

2017. Denzin & Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage 

2016. Creswell & Poth. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. 

2022. Madden, Raymond. Being ethnographic: a guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. (3rd ed.) Third. ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 

2014.Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing grounded theory. (2nd ed. ed) Introducing qualitative methods. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. 

 

General texts about mixed methods research

2014. Creswell, J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publications Inc. 

2018. Creswell, J. & Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd Ed. USA: Sage Publications.   

 

Data Analysis

2013.Grbich, Carol. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. 

 

Coding

2021. Saldana. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th Edition. Sage Publications 

 

Content Analysis

2022. Vears, Gillam. Inductive content analysis. A guide for beginning qualitative researchers https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544 (Full text)

2008. Elo, Kyngas The qualitative content analysis process. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x 

2005.Hsieh, Shannon. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 

 

Thematic Analysis

2021.Clarke, Braun. Thematic Analysis: a practical guide. Sage. Described by the authors as their most comprehensive guide to their thematic analysis approach yet! 

2021. Braun, Clarke. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 

2019. Braun, Clarke. Reflecting on thematic  analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 

Thematic analysis website resources (Clarke): https://www.thematicanalysis.net/resources-for-ta/ 

Clarke, Thematic analysis lectures-You tube 

2011. Smith, Firth. Qualitative data analysis. The Framework approach. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284 

 

Quality

2017. Kalu, Bwalya. What makes qualitative research good research. An exploratory analysis of critical elements. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711 

2018. Sanders, Sim, Kingstone. Saturation in qualitative research. Exploring its conceptualisation and operationalisation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 

2013. Walther, J., Sochacka, N.W. and Kellam, N.N. Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study. J. Eng. Educ., 102: 626-659. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20029 

2019. Braun, Clarke. To saturate or not to saturate. Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 

2023. D’Aprano, A., Lloyd-Johnsen, C., Cameron, D., Wunungmurra, A., Hull, C., Boyle, C., ... & Matthews, V. Trusting relationships and learning together: a rapid review of Indigenous reference groups in Australian Indigenous health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 47 (3), 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100051

 

Sampling

2010. Mason, M. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428 

2013. O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N.  ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106 

2014. Robinson, OC.  Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 

2018. Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7 

2022. Hennink, M, & Kaiser, BN.  Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 

 

Mixed Methods

2007. Tashakkori & Cresswell, editorial in Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1: 3-7,  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2345678906293042 

2013. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, JW.  Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117  

2015a. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222  

2015b. Fetters, M., & Freshwater, D. Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687 

2018. Hong et al. Mixed methods Appraisal Tool. Education for Information, 34 (4) pp285-291  

 

Interviews and Focus groups

2018. McGrath, C., Palmgren, P. J., & Liljedahl, M. Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher 41(9), 1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149

Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews.pdf

 

Involvement of children in research

2024. Wyatt, K. A., Bell, J., Cooper, J., Constable, L., Siero, W., Pozo Jeria, C., ... & Hughes, E. K. Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review. Health Expectations, 27(3), e14081.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14081